Gambler quod - est seu ultimum Wahlberg dynamite buzzkill?

0 Comments

Once again, the movie industry has chosen to take a classic film and turn it into a contemporary remake. Following in the footsteps of Alfie, Annie, and The Amityville Horror, The Gambler is the latest iconic film to be given a modern makeover. Now you may think it’s a fool’s errand to take a classic of such iconic status and give it a current twist – and we may be inclined to agree with you – but when the movie industry has dollar signs in their eyes, there’s no stopping them.

Favore ortus in ludis Casinariis - apicibus praecipue mobilibus adveniens, qui ludos magis fun et quam antea pervias faciunt - sine dubio ingens momentum habuit in sententia Hollywood ut hoc drama casino-substructio reviseret. Sed quomodo modernus reficit ad vetus timendum? Nonne industria magnum opus fecit, aut sicut saccus lapidum corruit?

The original version

Made in 1974, the original film starred James Caan as Jim Bennett – a self-loathing literature professor by day and a high-stakes gambler by night. It follows the story of Bennett’s struggle to come to terms with a gambling addiction and charts his actions as he runs up considerable debts, despite his wealthy background – first, to a Korean casino manager and then to a dodgy loan shark – and as he tries to correct the situation using his loved ones around him. It’s an emotional rollercoaster of rhetoric, self-denial and cringe-worthy bad decisions – and the casino scenes are tantalisingly authentic.

Vide quoque  Perpetuae et Nickels: Qui beat Las Vegas

Hodierna reformare

Released Christmas 2014, Mark Wahlberg steps into the shoes of the main man Jim, accompanied by Brie Larson as one of his concerned students and Jessica Lange playing a convincing role as Bennett’s wealthy mother. This Rupert Wyatt version certainly gives the original a run for its money, following the same plot as closely as possible but bringing the self-loathing element to the fore with Wahlberg’s signature pouting. When it comes to the action, the Blackjack momenta certo aemula originalis cum aliquibus scenis valde atmosphaericis quae te in ore sedis tuae habent.

Potes hic spectare officialem sex...

Quidam film facts

Linea nostra dilectissima (2014 versio) – ‘Quid tibi mali est? Damnum cerebri accepisti?'

(Frank addressing Jim: aliquantulus of bombshell postquam enumeravit bonas Frank's qualitates sicut lepos, vultus, privilegium et educationem).

Ita - quod est optimum?

Remansi pelliculae classicae quaelibet movendi periculosa est, et critici certe activae fuerunt. Plus momenti recentioris versionis esse Wahlberg faciendum putamus, coniuncta magno conatu ab (notabiliter calvo) John Goodman sicut malus guy loan turpis, Frank.

Sed videtur quod non omnes concordes sunt - dum Wahlberg agebat ut 'dynamita' a. UK'Diurna Guardiana, Vulture partum suum nominavit ut 'ultimum buzzkill' ostendens suam rhetoricam aliquando nimis ridiculam sentire. Paulum hoc durum putamus. Etiamsi Caan dictus est a aurea Globe ob interfectorem suum – et certissime probabilius – et quamvis Wahlberg talem attentionem non viderit, eius fuit notabilis conatus, praesertim cum consideres talem difficilem actum sequi.

Vide quoque  Quinque umbrae coloris viridis, Sex et alea

Sicut dominarum primarum, Miss Larson certum leporem habet, sed Lauren Hutton certe magis gliscens est. Scena hic vigilare potes et tibi consulere!

Locus IMdB currently recentem versionem ut 6.9 aestimat, sed originalem vinaceam in 7.2 – et quisnam disputandum est? Bellus tentant latinas – et magnas cum Nativitate Domini, ut nobis intermissum e tritis consuetis tribuat – sed aliquando, originale est melius….

Casino.com Bonuses >> Codes


Source: casino.com
Gambler quod - est seu ultimum Wahlberg dynamite buzzkill? updated: June 18, 2019 Ad Author: Damon